简要：As an interesting misunderstanding of hallucination, it is worth admitting that on January 20, 2007, the author: Timothy Farrell from Worcester, Massachusetts; "Wild on the Street"; From the same genre of film production, which gave birth to other attempts to link with the anti-mainstream culture; “Skidoo”； And ""; Candy ";. The difference between this and the films mentioned earlier is that; "Wild on the Street"; Quite smart and well made. It has no sympathy with the counterculture and may offend those who have good memories of that time. Surprisingly, the film was so popular after its release that it attracted young people who were laughed at by it. Different from ";" journey "; And ""; “Psych Out”； (The other two AIP films), it is not an accurate description of motion at all. However, it does play a role of social irony. Barry Shear's guidance is very good, and he innovatively uses split-screen photography. In addition, he let everything go at a fast pace. At interesting moments, the film performed very well. In the attempt of drama, it is helplessly outdated, just as interesting as humorous moments. Christopher Jones underestimated his role, while Shelly Winters overshadowed it. Hal Holbrook provided the best performance, and Diane Varsi realized the correct "" note; "Groove";. Robert Thomas' script has its moments, especially the ending (which is easily the most ingenious part of the film)" "Wild on the Street"; This is not perfect, but it is worth admitting that it is an interesting misunderstanding of hallucination. Those who like this kind of kitsch will like it best. I prefer to watch ";" journey "; Or ""; “Psych Out”； However (6/10) - from imdb
As an interesting misunderstanding of hallucination, it is worth admitting that on January 20, 2007, the author: Timothy Farrell from Worcester, Massachusetts; "Wild on the Street"; From the same genre of film production, which gave birth to other attempts to link with the anti-mainstream culture; “Skidoo”； And ""; Candy ";. The difference between this and the films mentioned earlier is that; "Wild on the Street"; Quite smart and well made. It has no sympathy with the counterculture and may offend those who have good memories of that time. Surprisingly, the film was so popular after its release that it attracted young people who were laughed at by it. Different from ";" journey "; And ""; “Psych Out”； (The other two AIP films), it is not an accurate description of motion at all. However, it does play a role of social irony. Barry Shear's guidance is very good, and he innovatively uses split-screen photography. In addition, he let everything go at a fast pace. At interesting moments, the film performed very well. In the attempt of drama, it is helplessly outdated, just as interesting as humorous moments. Christopher Jones underestimated his role, while Shelly Winters overshadowed it. Hal Holbrook provided the best performance, and Diane Varsi realized the correct "" note; "Groove";. Robert Thomas' script has its moments, especially the ending (which is easily the most ingenious part of the film)" "Wild on the Street"; This is not perfect, but it is worth admitting that it is an interesting misunderstanding of hallucination. Those who like this kind of kitsch will like it best. I prefer to watch ";" journey "; Or ""; “Psych Out”； However (6/10) - from imdb展开
